Skip to main content
Crayons & Code

Performance myths: why score chasing fails and what works instead

You can improve a performance score without improving real experience. Here's why score chasing fails and what works instead.

Why score chasing fails

Performance scores are useful tools, but they are not the goal. Chasing a perfect score can lead you away from real improvements.

For more on performance myths and what actually works, see performance myths and quick fixes.

Common performance myths

Myth 1: "A score of 100 means the site is fast"

Lighthouse scores are useful, but they are lab tests Source 2 . They cannot represent every device, network, or user journey.

A perfect score in the lab does not guarantee fast performance for real users.

Myth 2: "A plugin will fix performance"

Performance plugins promise quick fixes, but the biggest wins nearly always come from fundamental changes.

Plugins can help, but they cannot fix fundamental problems with page weight and loading order.

Myth 3: "Core Web Vitals are only for SEO"

Core Web Vitals are user experience signals Source 1 . Google defines and documents them as real-world performance metrics.

Improving Core Web Vitals improves real user experience, not just search rankings.

Myth 4: "Quick fixes are enough"

Quick fixes can help, but sustainable performance comes from good foundations.

Quick fixes are useful, but they work best when combined with fundamental improvements.

What works instead

1) Measure lab and field

Use both lab tests and real user data to understand performance Source 3 .

2) Set budgets

Set clear limits for page weight, request count, and third-party scripts.

Budgets help prevent performance from drifting over time.

3) Fix the big offenders first

Prioritise fixes that make the biggest difference to real users.

Focus on what users experience, not just what scores measure.

4) Re-test and document changes

Test before and after changes, using the same test conditions.

Documentation helps you understand what worked and what did not.

Real user experience matters most

Performance is about how your site feels to real users Source 4 , not about achieving perfect scores.

Summary

Performance myths: perfect scores mean fast sites, plugins fix everything, Core Web Vitals are only for SEO, quick fixes are enough.

What works: measure lab and field, set budgets, fix big offenders first, re-test and document changes.

Real user experience matters most. Focus on how your site feels to real users, not just scores.

For more on performance myths and what actually works, see performance myths and quick fixes. For help improving performance, see performance services or fix a slow website. For more on what fast means, see fast websites: what fast means in 2026. You can also get in touch to discuss your performance needs.

Sources

  1. [1] web.dev. Web Vitals. View source Back to article
  2. [2] Google. Lighthouse performance scoring. Published: . View source Back to article
  3. [3] Google. Chrome UX Report. Published: . View source Back to article
  4. [4] web.dev. Why does speed matter?. Published: . View source Back to article
  5. [5] web.dev. Load Third-Party JavaScript. Published: . View source Back to article

Availability

Next full project start: March 2026.
Small jobs: 3 to 7 days. Capacity: up to 14 hours per week.