Most people only see the surface, a slick looking template, a low monthly cost, and a few buzzwords. But site builders and free WordPress themes often come with serious compromises.
Performance, accessibility, legal compliance, and ownership are rarely prioritised. If you run a business, charity, or public-facing service, those things matter Source 3 Source 4 .
The problems with site builders
Wix, Squarespace, GoDaddy, and other drag-and-drop builders suit simple brochure sites. They often struggle once you need stronger performance control, better accessibility, or cleaner SEO foundations Source 1 Source 3 .
Where they fall short:
-
You do not own the platform
Stop paying and the site goes offline. Moving away often means rebuild work, not a clean export Source 7 . -
You are stuck with templates
The designs are generic and built around their system. You end up working around limits instead of matching your content and journeys. -
Performance control is limited
Builder output often adds extra script and markup you do not control. That increases page weight and slows key pages Source 1 . -
Accessibility risk increases
Layout choices and components can break keyboard navigation, screen reader behaviour, or contrast. Without proper testing, issues slip through Source 3 . -
Support tends to scale with price
When something breaks, you often get generic guidance instead of fixes tailored to your site.
The truth about WordPress
WordPress is popular. Popular does not mean low-risk by default.
The outcome depends on theme markup, plugin choices, hosting, and how updates get handled Source 8 .
-
Security risk rises with complexity
A larger plugin surface increases the attack surface. Patching and safe update workflows matter Source 8 Source 6 Source 7 . -
Plugin bloat
Many sites rely on multiple plugins for core features. That adds code, requests, and more failure points Source 1 . -
Ongoing maintenance
Updates can clash across plugins and themes. Without regular checks, issues turn into emergency work Source 8 . -
Accessibility varies widely
Many themes and builders ship weak patterns for menus, modals, and forms. Manual testing is what catches the blockers Source 3 . -
WordPress still needs expertise
The software is free. Keeping it fast, secure, and reliable takes skill and time Source 1 Source 7 .
Legal risk is part of the picture
Accessibility is not only a technical preference. It links to legal duties and procurement checks, depending on your organisation Source 4 Source 5 .
A better alternative
I build websites that:
- Match what you need, without filler
- Meet accessibility standards from the start Source 3
- Load quickly and run efficiently Source 1
- Keep hosting flexible, with clear ownership
- Avoid theme stacks and plugin piles as the default approach
When the contract ends, you still have a working site. You can move it, run it where you like, and you are not tied to one vendor.
Not sure what you are using?
If you are a bit unsure whether your current setup helps or holds you back, I will review it. Site Score gives you a clear breakdown of what works and what does not, and the quick report is free.
Want something proper?
If you want a website that works, loads quickly, meets legal and technical standards, and reflects who you are and what you do, I will help.
Or request a Site Score for a no-nonsense performance breakdown of your current site, the quick report is free.
Sources
- [1] web.dev. Web Vitals. Back to article
- [2] Google Search Central. Search Console. Page Experience report. Back to article
- [3] W3C. Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.2. Back to article
- [4] legislation.gov.uk. Equality Act 2010. Back to article
- [5] legislation.gov.uk. Public Sector Bodies Accessibility Regulations 2018. Back to article
- [6] OWASP. OWASP Top 10. Back to article
- [7] NCSC. Web application security guidance. Back to article
- [8] WordPress.org. WordPress. Security. Back to article